“Australia in the Asian Century”: Breaking the Repeater Circuit

23/06/13

“We have not been here before”. This was the phrase Julia Gillard deployed to announce the launch of the “Australia in the Asia Century” White Paper project in 2011. The awkward truth for us all though is that we have been here before. Many, many times. The perennial rediscovery of Asia is as much a part of Australian culture as calling your mates on Saturday morning to work out what you did the night before. Australia has envisioned itself as preparing for a “new” Asian future almost every generation since before Federation, and yet despite a lot of gasbagging and grandstanding there has been precious little progress in our underlying attitudes towards ourselves as part of Asia.

Gillard’s hyperbole was ominously reminiscent of countless Australian voices past. The routinised rhetoric of our need to deal with an unprecedented Asia stretches beyond Rudd’s poltroon National Asian Languages and Studies in Schools Program, Keating’s inexplicably-cut National Asian Languages and Studies in Australian Schools program, the State and Federal Governments’ hollow response to Ross Garnaut’s 1989 “Australia and the Northeast Asian Ascendancy” report, all the way back to popular writer Frank Clune’s 1939 exhortation of Australians to “wake up” to Asian markets and prominent newspaper editor T.W. Heney’s observation in 1919 that “every Australian businessman should carry a map of China in his head”.

Thus it seems that the Australian polity and broader society has always had some underlying awareness of Asia, its impact on Australian national life, and the opportunities for greater prosperity if Australia were more Asia-capable. The White Paper is just the latest cyclical repetition of the dramatisation of our immediate need to respond to Asia, but critical voices have already emerged pointing out the Paper’s lack of concrete initiatives and funding sources, and calling into question our national political commitment.

What then prevents us from committing for the long haul? Why does the hype around Australia’s unpreparedness for Asia always fizzle out? And why is it made to seem like we are encountering the “Asian Question” for the first time?

Is it because the Asia-capabilities debate forces us to face discomforting questions about our own Australian national identity? Are we yet to transcend the latent prejudices of our chequered past as a so-thought “culturally-superior” Western outpost resisting our geography amidst a perceived threatening tide of “colour”? Do we actually not have a collective historical knowledge of Australia-Asia engagement? Does post-colonial insecurity self-reinforce our staunch social predilection toward monolingualism and the framing of engagement with Asia in overwhelmingly economic (entity-to-entity) rather than closer socio-cultural (people-to-people) terms?

Perhaps it is less the “Asian Question” than the “Australian Question”. Economic complementarities have drawn us together, but we have broadly failed to achieve a greater Australia through this. We are not Asia-literate yet and still view ourselves and are viewed in turn as outsiders. We need to be Australia realists, get over ourselves, and realise the gaping disparity between our complacent actuality and our immense potentiality. For over a century Australians have let themselves and future generations down through myopic, blinkered, and timid attitudes devaluing cross-cultural knowledge and failing to put in the educational hard yards. From a young person’s perspective, this is why the evidently beneficial study of Asian languages and societies is still a cultural anomaly rather than an educational assumption, despite us seeing Asia reap untold boons from their acceptance of the value of second-language learning.

As young people who only realised the benefits of learning an Asian language in our twenties after living in Asia, from countless hours of eyeball-drying study and ear-grating practice we can safely say that whilst it is possible to master Asian languages, our late start means we are still playing catch-up. It would have been an unparalleled advantage and enabled us to have already done far more with our time overseas if we had studied the language from childhood. The limits of our language are the limits of our thought. Learning other languages makes one aware of otherwise invisible opportunities and allows for truer and more complete dialogue, enabling Australians to connect with and understand the many peoples of Asia in a manner beyond, and yet extremely beneficial toward, the narrow economically grounded framework of the White Paper.

Whilst the White Paper should be lauded for its intentions and recommendations, for the sake of generations to come and future national prosperity, we must ensure that it is the last policy document of its type.

Asia engagement does not need to be highly dramatised, it just needs to finally be done.

Neil Thomas is an Honours student in Chinese political economy at the University of Western Australia and a 2013 Prime Minister’s Australia Asia Endeavour Award holder. He was previously a Chinese Government Scholar at Zhejiang University and the Renmin University of China. He is National Publications Director of the Australia-China Youth Association (www.acya.org.au).

Thomas Williams is an Asian Studies Honours student at the University of Western Australia and completed a 2011 Prime Minister’s Australia Asia Endeavour Award at Peking University in Beijing. He has previously studied on scholarship at Zhejiang University, Beijing Language & Culture University, and the Renmin University of China. He is National President (Australia) of the Australia-China Youth Association.

NB: This article was first-published in Online Opinion, 8 February 2013, http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=14668

The Australia-China Youth Dialogue welcomes the University of Sydney's China Studies Centre as an Associate Partner

acyd-news.png

University of Sydney LogoThe Australia-China Youth Dialogue is proud to announce that the University of Sydney's China Studies Centre has come on board as an Associate Partner for the 2013 Australia-China Youth Dialogue. Professor Kerry Brown, the Executive Director of the China Studies Centre and Professor of Chinese Politics, stated that "the China Studies Centre at the University of Sydney are glad to support this years Australia China Youth Dialogue. Engaging young professionals and academics in China in their work and their lives is critically important, and building deeper links between the two countries is something we fully support and wish to see flourish."

For more information on the University of Sydney's China Studies Centre, please see: http://sydney.edu.au/china_studies_centre/

2013 ACYD FAQs

中文/Chinese

How do I apply to be a delegate at the 2013 ACYD?

  •  Send a cover letter and CV accompanied by a letter of recommendation from a referee to acydapplications@acyd.org.au
  •  Include the subject line: “Application to 2013 ACYD”
  •  The CV, cover letter and letter of recommendation should be attached as a single pdf document.
  •  The cover letter and letter of recommendation should address the question “what unique aspect can you bring to the ACYD?”
  •  You should indicate whether you are applying to be an Australian or Chinese delegate.

When is the deadline for applicants?

  • For Australian applicants, the deadline for applications is 11:59pm AEST, 30 June 2013.
  • For Chinese applicants, the deadline for applications is 11:59 BST, 30 June 2013.

When will I hear back from you?

  • Shortlisted applicants will be invited to interview by phone or Skype within approximately two weeks after close of applications.
  • We expect that successful applicants will be informed in mid-July.

Can I submit an application in Chinese or must it be in English?

  • The ACYD is a bilingual dialogue.  Applications in both Chinese and English are accepted.  However, Chinese applicants must also be able to demonstrate a high level of English language proficiency.

What characteristics are you looking for? What makes a competitive application?

  • ACYD accepts outstanding delegates from a range of backgrounds and experiences and there are no formal criteria other than the age range and citizenship requirements. In all cases the potential to be a leader in your field is considered very important.
  • Biographies of previous delegates are available in the 2010 and 2011 ACYD Summary Reports, available on our website. Information on past Australian delegates can be accessed here, and past Chinese delegates can be accessed here.

What is the typical age of ACYD delegates? How is the age criteria determined?

  • The ACYD is open to Australian and Chinese applicants between the ages of 18 and 35. We understand that within that age range, older applicants are likely to have achieved more than younger applicants by virtue of their age. The ACYD is looking for outstanding delegates who are impressive in relation to their peers, and this is the basis applicants will be assessed on.
  • To be eligible for the ACYD you must be between the ages of 18 to 35 on the 24th of September 2013.

What if I'm ethnically Chinese but my citizenship is neither PRC or Australian, am I eligible?

  • Normally ACYD will only select citizens or residents of China and Australia, but exceptional cases may be considered.  A candidate who is not a citizen of the PRC or a citizen or permanent resident of Australia would need to provide a strong argument in support of their candidacy. There is no cost for applying, and whether you apply or not is up to you, but the ACYD organisers reserve the right to make final decisions about delegate selection.
  • The ACYD welcomes applications from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwanese residents.

What expenses will the ACYD cover?

Travel

  • The ACYD will provide all travel for the duration of the ACYD, from Canberra to Melbourne and return.
  • Delegates must make their own arrangements to arrive in Canberra at the beginning of ACYD 2013.
  • The ACYD will provide a $AU 500 subsidy to delegates travelling internationally to attend ACYD 2013.

Other expenses

  • The ACYD will generally cover expenses associated with the ACYD 2013 (but see visa and insurance costs below).  This includes accommodation in Canberra and Melbourne between 24 September 2013 and 29 September 2013, and all food and drink consumed at formal ACYD 2013 events.

Personal expenses

  • The ACYD does not cover personal expenses, such as room service, or food and beverages consumed outside official ACYD 2013 events.  In previous years, delegates have often arranged to visit bars and clubs in the evenings following scheduled events.  Costs incurred visiting bars and clubs are not covered by the ACYD.  If Delegates wish to stay at the ACYD 2013 accommodation beyond 29 September 2013, they will have to make their own arrangements with the hotel.

Are there any fees charged to delegates?

  • No.  ACYD does not charge delegates any fees.

Do I need a Visa?

  • Citizens or residents of China will need a visa to travel to Australia.  Delegates must make applications for a Visitor visa.  The ACYD will provide delegates with a letter of invitation to assist in this process.  All costs associated with visas must be paid by the delegate.  More information on applying for Australian visas can be found here for PRC residents, and here for residents of Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.

Do I need insurance?

  • Delegates attending ACYD 2013 do so at their own risk in all respects. Delegates are responsible for all their own insurance, including travel, life, injury and theft insurance plus any other insurance delegates may wish to have.  The ACYD bears no liability for any health costs, loss or other expenses incurred by Delegates while attending ACYD 2013.  Delegates are strongly encouraged to take out travel insurance.

Privacy

  • The ACYD respects applicants’ privacy and will not pass information on to third parties without your consent.  Successful delegates will be required to have their information posted on the ACYD website, and forwarded to our Major Partners.
  • In addition, by accepting an offer as a delegate, you acknowledge and accept that you may appear in photographs and video footage taken by the Australia-China Youth Dialogue during the event. Some of this content may be made available in the public web sphere and/or used in communications and reports in relation to Australia-China Youth Dialogue activities. By agreeing to be interviewed by the Australia-China Youth Dialogue in any format, you agree to share any intellectual property contained in the interview under an appropriate Creative Commons license.

What do I do if I still have questions?

  • If you still have questions please contact the Dialogue’s Human Resources Intern, Yuzhou (Vincent) Hu at vincent.hu@acyd.org.au

Clive Lee (2012 Chinese Delegate)

中澳青年对话”是一个无与伦比的活动!」这样说足以说明这是我参加过最高水平的国际青年会议! 一周的思想盛宴,让你身处世界的顶端,看到不一样的画面!你将遇见世界级的讲者, 如澳大利亚驻北京大使,联合国发展计划中国总监, JP Morgan中国全球市场董事总经理兼主席等. 内容广泛,从政治,国际关系,经济商业,文化艺术, 环境保育,能源,非牟利发展,社会创新等均一一涵盖.从他们对于中澳关系的宏观看法,并与之深入交流,你将得到无法想像的思想冲击,激荡和启发!我对于“中澳青年对话”的深爱还来自于中澳两方各个专业的代表,与其高水平的交流,分享大家的不同观点,信念与价值,如何达到协同效应.我們現在正在共同撰写一份文件, 希望可以启发未来中澳关系的友好发展!“中澳青年对话”不单是一个交流活动,而是一个共同探索的旅程,现在这个旅程才刚要 开始!

Jade Little (2012 Australian Delegate)

ACYD far exceeded my expectations. It was a thought-provoking five days that examined issues from politics, economics and law to culture and sports. This encouraged me to broaden my understanding of the Australia-China relationship, and inspired me to re-affirm my commitment to it. I cannot speak highly enough of the diverse range of speakers, delegates and organisers. While all incredibly intelligent and high-achieving, they were also a lot of fun (which lead to much sleep-deprivation as one would often go out in the evenings after a full day of dialogue). The locations selected and events organised were also superb: Capital M Restaurant in Beijing, Taichi in Jingshan Park, Chengdu Panda Base, Tainfu Software Park, the list goes on. I cannot recommend ACYD enough to any young person who has an interest in the Australia-China relationship. You will learn a lot, you will meet amazing individuals, you will make fantastic friends, and ultimately you will be inspired.

Kyle Fox (2012 Australian Delegate)

Seven days with no sleep, no peace, a blizzard of ideas, personalities and language. It made foie gras of my previously fairly healthy mind, force fed on a diet of eureka moments, chilli and the occasional beer. As a self-proclaimed Sinophile who has not had a decent bowl of dandanmian in seven years, ACYD gave me the opportunity to talk with the people who are currently doing the deals, framing the big questions and pioneering new aspects of the Australia-China relationship. More importantly, I ate frog, sang karaoke, practiced tai chi, cracked bad jokes, exchanged cringe worthy dance moves and pretended to be sophisticated with a group of truly excellent young and youngish people from Australia and China. By the end of the week, I was like an eight year old being dragged home from the Easter Show, tired, emotional, but thinking of every type of scheme I could imagine so I could stay in China with my new friends just a little longer.

FENG Shenghao/冯晟昊 (2012 Chinese Delegate)

It’s funny when I just count the days. The whole ACYD activities only went on for five days, but it has since become a referencing point for me ever since. Hardly a day or two go by without hearing interesting things from the delegates and organisers. And the circle just keeps getting larger and larger. I never could imagine meeting so many interesting people who share similar interests with myself. The ACYD is like Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Weibo, Wikipedia, Big Bang Theory and all the good stuff combined and squeezed in a 3-dimensional reality bombshell – it’s ADDICTIVE, but in a good way.